 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9M291 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.67 (see score help below)
1 MAAPVPPGAYRPNNNQQNSGGPPNFVPGSQGNPNSLAANMQNLNINRPPP 50
51 PMPGSGPRPSPPFGQSPQSFPQQQQQQPRPSPMARPGPPPPAAMARPGGP 100
101 PQVSQPGGFPPVGRPVAPPSNQPPFGGRPSTGPLVGGGSSFPQPGGFPAS 150
151 GPPGGVPSGPPSGARPIGFGSPPPMGPGMSMPPPSGMPGGPLSNGPPPSG 200
201 MHGGHLSNGPPPSGMPGGPLSNGPPPPMMGPGAFPRGSQFTSGPMMAPPP 250
251 PYGQPPNAGPFTGNSPLSSPPAHSIPPPTNFPGVPYGRPPMPGGFPYGAP 300
301 PQQLPSAPGTPGSIYGMGPMQNQSMTSVSSPSKIDLNQIPRPGSSSSPIV 350
351 YETRVENKANPPPPTTVDYITRDTGNSSPRYMRCTINQIPCTVDLLSTSG 400
401 MQLALIVQPMALSHPSEEPIQVVDFGESGPVRCSRCKGYVNPFMKFIDQG 450
451 RKFICNLCGYTDETPRDYQCNLGPDGRRRDADERPELCRGTVDFVATKEY 500
501 MVRDPMPAVYFFLIDVSMNAIQTGATAAACSAIQQVLSDLPEGPRTFVGI 550
551 ATFDSTIHFYNLKRALQQPLMLIVPDVQDVYTPLETDVIVQLSECRQHLE 600
601 ILLESIPTMFQESKSPESAFGAAVKAAFLAMKSTGGKLMVFQSVLPSVGI 650
651 GALSSREADGRANASAGEKEAHKLLQPADKTLRTMAIEFAEYQVCVDLFI 700
701 TTQAYVDMASISEIPRTTGGQVYCYYPFSALSDPPKLYNDLRWNITRPQG 750
751 FEAVMRVRCSQGIQVQEYSGNFCKRIPTDIDLPAIDCDKAIMVTLKHDDK 800
801 LQDGAECGFQCALLYTTISGERRIRVLNLSIPCTNMLSNLFRSADLDSQF 850
851 ACMLKQAANEIPSKALPLVKEQATNDCITILHSYRKFCATVTSTGQLILP 900
901 EALKLLPLYTLALTKGVGLRMDGRIDDRSFWINHVSSLSTPLAIPLVYPR 950
951 MIAVHDLDANDNEENVVPCPIPLQSEHLSDEGVYFLENGEDGLIYIGESV 1000
1001 NSDILQKLFNVRSAAELPSQYVLQKYDNQLSKKFNDVVNEIRRQRSSYLR 1050
1051 IKLCKKGDPAGNMLFQSYMVEDRGSGGASYVDFLVSVHRQIQHKLN 1096
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.