 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9NQ11 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.35 (see score help below)
1 MSADSSPLVGSTPTGYGTLTIGTSIDPLSSSVSSVRLSGYCGSPWRVIGY 50
51 HVVVWMMAGIPLLLFRWKPLWGVRLRLRPCNLAHAETLVIEIRDKEDSSW 100
101 QLFTVQVQTEAIGEGSLEPSPQSQAEDGRSQAAVGAVPEGAWKDTAQLHK 150
151 SEEAVSVGQKRVLRYYLFQGQRYIWIETQQAFYQVSLLDHGRSCDDVHRS 200
201 RHGLSLQDQMVRKAIYGPNVISIPVKSYPQLLVDEALNPYYGFQAFSIAL 250
251 WLADHYYWYALCIFLISSISICLSLYKTRKQSQTLRDMVKLSMRVCVCRP 300
301 GGEEEWVDSSELVPGDCLVLPQEGGLMPCDAALVAGECMVNESSLTGESI 350
351 PVLKTALPEGLGPYCAETHRRHTLFCGTLILQARAYVGPHVLAVVTRTGF 400
401 CTAKGGLVSSILHPRPINFKFYKHSMKFVAALSVLALLGTIYSIFILYRN 450
451 RVPLNEIVIRALDLVTVVVPPALPAAMTVCTLYAQSRLRRQGIFCIHPLR 500
501 INLGGKLQLVCFDKTGTLTEDGLDVMGVVPLKGQAFLPLVPEPRRLPVGP 550
551 LLRALATCHALSRLQDTPVGDPMDLKMVESTGWVLEEEPAADSAFGTQVL 600
601 AVMRPPLWEPQLQAMEEPPVPVSVLHRFPFSSALQRMSVVVAWPGATQPE 650
651 AYVKGSPELVAGLCNPETVPTDFAQMLQSYTAAGYRVVALASKPLPTVPS 700
701 LEAAQQLTRDTVEGDLSLLGLLVMRNLLKPQTTPVIQALRRTRIRAVMVT 750
751 GDNLQTAVTVARGCGMVAPQEHLIIVHATHPERGQPASLEFLPMESPTAV 800
801 NGVKDPDQAASYTVEPDPRSRHLALSGPTFGIIVKHFPKLLPKVLVQGTV 850
851 FARMAPEQKTELVCELQKLQYCVGMCGDGANDCGALKAADVGISLSQAEA 900
901 SVVSPFTSSMASIECVPMVIREGRCSLDTSFSVFKYMALYSLTQFISVLI 950
951 LYTINTNLGDLQFLAIDLVITTTVAVLMSRTGPALVLGRVRPPGALLSVP 1000
1001 VLSSLLLQMVLVTGVQLGGYFLTLAQPWFVPLNRTVAAPDNLPNYENTVV 1050
1051 FSLSSFQYLILAAAVSKGAPFRRPLYTNVPFLVALALLSSVLVGLVLVPG 1100
1101 LLQGPLALRNITDTGFKLLLLGLVTLNFVGAFMLESVLDQCLPACLRRLR 1150
1151 PKRASKKRFKQLERELAEQPWPPLPAGPLR 1180
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.