| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9NQW6 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.98 (see score help below)
1 MDPFTEKLLERTRARRENLQRKMAERPTAAPRSMTHAKRARQPLSEASNQ 50
51 QPLSGGEEKSCTKPSPSKKRCSDNTEVEVSNLENKQPVESTSAKSCSPSP 100
101 VSPQVQPQAADTISDSVAVPASLLGMRRGLNSRLEATAASSVKTRMQKLA 150
151 EQRRRWDNDDMTDDIPESSLFSPMPSEEKAASPPRPLLSNASATPVGRRG 200
201 RLANLAATICSWEDDVNHSFAKQNSVQEQPGTACLSKFSSASGASARINS 250
251 SSVKQEATFCSQRDGDASLNKALSSSADDASLVNASISSSVKATSPVKST 300
301 TSITDAKSCEGQNPELLPKTPISPLKTGVSKPIVKSTLSQTVPSKGELSR 350
351 EICLQSQSKDKSTTPGGTGIKPFLERFGERCQEHSKESPARSTPHRTPII 400
401 TPNTKAIQERLFKQDTSSSTTHLAQQLKQERQKELACLRGRFDKGNIWSA 450
451 EKGGNSKSKQLETKQETHCQSTPLKKHQGVSKTQSLPVTEKVTENQIPAK 500
501 NSSTEPKGFTECEMTKSSPLKITLFLEEDKSLKVTSDPKVEQKIEVIREI 550
551 EMSVDDDDINSSKVINDLFSDVLEEGELDMEKSQEEMDQALAESSEEQED 600
601 ALNISSMSLLAPLAQTVGVVSPESLVSTPRLELKDTSRSDESPKPGKFQR 650
651 TRVPRAESGDSLGSEDRDLLYSIDAYRSQRFKETERPSIKQVIVRKEDVT 700
701 SKLDEKNNAFPCQVNIKQKMQELNNEINMQQTVIYQASQALNCCVDEEHG 750
751 KGSLEEAEAERLLLIATGKRTLLIDELNKLKNEGPQRKNKASPQSEFMPS 800
801 KGSVTLSEIRLPLKADFVCSTVQKPDAANYYYLIILKAGAENMVATPLAS 850
851 TSNSLNGDALTFTTTFTLQDVSNDFEINIEVYSLVQKKDPSGLDKKKKTS 900
901 KSKAITPKRLLTSITTKSNIHSSVMASPGGLSAVRTSNFALVGSYTLSLS 950
951 SVGNTKFVLDKVPFLSSLEGHIYLKIKCQVNSSVEERGFLTIFEDVSGFG 1000
1001 AWHRRWCVLSGNCISYWTYPDDEKRKNPIGRINLANCTSRQIEPANREFC 1050
1051 ARRNTFELITVRPQREDDRETLVSQCRDTLCVTKNWLSADTKEERDLWMQ 1100
1101 KLNQVLVDIRLWQPDACYKPIGKP 1124
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.