 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9R0K7 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.23 (see score help below)
1 MGDMTNSDFYSKNQRNESSHGGEFGCTMEELRSLMELRGTEAVVKIKETY 50
51 GDTEAICRRLKTSPVEGLPGTAPDLEKRKQIFGQNFIPPKKPKTFLQLVW 100
101 EALQDVTLIILEIAAIISLGLSFYHPPGESNEGCATAQGGAEDEGEAEAG 150
151 WIEGAAILLSVICVVLVTAFNDWSKEKQFRGLQSRIEQEQKFTVVRAGQV 200
201 VQIPVAEIVVGDIAQIKYGDLLPADGLFIQGNDLKIDESSLTGESDQVRK 250
251 SVDKDPMLLSGTHVMEGSGRMVVTAVGVNSQTGIIFTLLGAGGEEEEKKD 300
301 KKAKQQDGAAAMEMQPLKSAEGGDADDKKKANMHKKEKSVLQGKLTKLAV 350
351 QIGKAGLVMSAITVIILVLYFTVDTFVVNKKPWLTECTPVYVQYFVKFFI 400
401 IGVTVLVVAVPEGLPLAVTISLAYSVKKMMKDNNLVRHLDACETMGNATA 450
451 ICSDKTGTLTTNRMTVVQAYVGDVHYKEIPDPSSINAKTLELLVNAIAIN 500
501 SAYTTKILPPEKEGALPRQVGNKTECGLLGFVLDLRQDYEPVRSQMPEEK 550
551 LYKVYTFNSVRKSMSTVIKMPDESFRMYSKGASEIVLKKCCKILSGAGEA 600
601 RVFRPRDRDEMVKKVIEPMACDGLRTICVAYRDFPSSPEPDWDNENDILN 650
651 ELTCICVVGIEDPVRPEVPEAIRKCQRAGITVRMVTGDNINTARAIAIKC 700
701 GIIHPGEDFLCLEGKEFNRRIRNEKGEIEQERIDKIWPKLRVLARSSPTD 750
751 KHTLVKGIIDSTHTEQRQVVAVTGDGTNDGPALKKADVGFAMGIAGTDVA 800
801 KEASDIILTDDNFSSIVKAVMWGRNVYDSISKFLQFQLTVNVVAVIVAFT 850
851 GACITQDSPLKAVQMLWVNLIMDTFASLALATEPPTETLLLRKPYGRNKP 900
901 LISRTMMKNILGHAVYQLTLIFTLLFVGEKMFQIDSGRNAPLHSPPSEHY 950
951 TIIFNTFVMMQLFNEINARKIHGERNVFDGIFRNPIFCTIVLGTFAIQIV 1000
1001 IVQFGGKPFSCSPLQLDQWMWCIFIGLGELVWGQVIATIPTSRLKFLKEA 1050
1051 GRLTQKEEIPEEELNEDVEEIDHAERELRRGQILWFRGLNRIQTQIRVVK 1100
1101 AFRSSLYEGLEKPESRTSIHNFMAHPEFRIEDSQPHIPLIDDTDLEEDAA 1150
1151 LKQNSSPPSSLNKNNSAIDSGINLTTDTSKSATSSSPGSPIHSLETSL 1198
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.