 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9VM75 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.76 (see score help below)
1 MSTALAQQLQKLAAPQSSVTLADARSRASILFDPKEAATKDRRSIYEIGL 50
51 TGLQELTDFNPAFKEFQLTLFDEATLTLERSVELPEINKMLDAAIAKFLR 100
101 LLSPYLLLRPAHMAFEWLLRRFQVHEYNRSEVMALILPYHETMIFVQIVK 150
151 TMRLRSSDGDWYWLRPLQRPGVPLAKTAIINRAASNPAFLGFICQSTQKA 200
201 VKELGPRAHQLQAQINFYATVVVGALQTAKPLQDWHITTILESLLRGLIS 250
251 DNIDFMAAAYVIVAQLVSRTKLKSKVCNALLERVANCPFERLHSESLLLL 300
301 VCIYGKQQAALPHFKPETILNLVGKKWLISTLSSLAKGNIAIQSICMPLM 350
351 TGAVAAIRDDDASSNSCKLFLDNLLSEVPMPKPTAQQLINCFLDTYVETA 400
401 IDAPEPMETNSNEDDDTIVIDSDDEIETEKTTFQAWYSTYLEKLERRYPE 450
451 AFDLSVKEALRSKSSTSNRQKALKLALGFRLNTTDEKAKHAYEKLYHYSA 500
501 DWRLSAVQKLLQNLNVTKKRERSVKLLQECLPDRINDDSGAVVSTLLSLP 550
551 TEELAEMLGPLPLAQTLCHLLYRAQSEKDEEWQPVVPLAVRHLTSALVSG 600
601 SYDTNLVLLALMPLLFPGEALAEHQHKALRILLGSDFVSKVPFLAELKVS 650
651 NKFSDFNVGEHRQHFLDIIASSNQELSSQERALLQSVEDHGGELYIQKAS 700
701 QLTHLLLLLTAYAKRELQPRESLHMLEKIGLYSRRLQFRVVNGSQNTQNC 750
751 APLQLYVDFLLTLVKNTKWTALASTPWNQMTDELRLCLRLLEIICAQVFS 800
801 EKADQPERQEWTRALQQSLQLILPEAQDRLEVLSNFYVFERLPELWPRDS 850
851 DYAVFRLQGFIILEAVLSNPKSQIDCGLVHVLRVANACGSPLQTLRVQAI 900
901 NILQLISNRKLVSHVEQLVRSLLQRKSELSMDHEQYALILYTILEPEKAT 950
951 AKERLVLSKLKRSVLALASDPKQSPICTASLLAALKHVNDENFLNELLPL 1000
1001 GLDSLKTITAGEDNQNIKQLPWPHSEIYKSVIERFEGRVALNVLLRKDLA 1050
1051 WKLFEDSFAQYDTYVQLEQKLQPLPCVLLNSLTPETFEQMHAKHKIALIK 1100
1101 LIVESATNSDNDSIFLASHRLLKRCRLDCQPLVPILLEMANTKVEKKQPV 1150
1151 KRRSVQATQLDLTSPYWKQGMTLLELLEHKKQLVGAELLIPPLFELLQAC 1200
1201 LTMEEHSAAEYPKQLILSSLLHCCQTAQSAGVQLVKAMPESSFRIELVVQ 1250
1251 SLRNTRNPQTQQHALLFLTHCAGMYPQQVLHKIVEIFTFVGSTVARHDDA 1300
1301 FSLHIIHNVVESIIPILLLNTGHNELVIPVLKVFADICTDVPVHRRLPLY 1350
1351 ATLFRVLEPKEHLWQFLCIIFESQVLLEQVPQKVSTDKSRLDFARELTLM 1400
1401 FEDPTVAIQTCIRLLDYLAKLPATKSSLSGGSGSSVLSTEQQLFDVRTRT 1450
1451 FKQLRHYKYLIMDFLSGISSCNEWEKKMKRPDPNELLPYYQEFILKTLAY 1500
1501 VGVLNGALEAASETPSLEKFWRVLANHAHDVLDNAIGLLAPQHFISVITE 1550
1551 LLKHDHVYVRIKVMDLLVTKLSPSSDYFQQSNAEHFGVLFAPLQEIINGI 1600
1601 LEGSSNSAQQAKLQQTALHALQLLALRHGRDYIEECRSLLATLTKITKRR 1650
1651 ANVPKAVVGNVVLTLVEICASLKAHALAQLPKFAPQLTELLKEQVHQMAS 1700
1701 LKQGPDYVCSTLVTALHKLFKALPLFLGPYLVDIIGGLARLSVQLENPQL 1750
1751 LQDKRTQVLKQKLADVWSAVAQGVEVRILVPSCAKAFSSLLEQQAYDELG 1800
1801 HLMQQLLLQSVRHNSAAQLQPVQDPLSELFLQALNFRLQVRGLGLQRQLV 1850
1851 SDVEASITETFVTWILKLSETSFRPMYSRVHKWALESTSRETRLTYFLLT 1900
1901 NRIAEALKSLFVLFASDFVEDSSRLLTEHNSIRPEFEVEEREDDVDLLMA 1950
1951 ILNTLHHVFLYCSEDFINDHRFNVLMPPLVNQLENDLVLGNESLQQVLSN 2000
2001 CIAQFAVATNDVMWKQLNSQVLLKTRTSNPEVRILAFNSCVAIARKLGES 2050
2051 YAALLPETVPFIAELLEDEHQRVEKNTRTGVQELETILGESVQKYL 2096
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.