 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9Y6K5 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.41 (see score help below)
1 MDLYSTPAAALDRFVARRLQPRKEFVEKARRALGALAAALRERGGRLGAA 50
51 APRVLKTVKGGSSGRGTALKGGCDSELVIFLDCFKSYVDQRARRAEILSE 100
101 MRASLESWWQNPVPGLRLTFPEQSVPGALQFRLTSVDLEDWMDVSLVPAF 150
151 NVLGQAGSGVKPKPQVYSTLLNSGCQGGEHAACFTELRRNFVNIRPAKLK 200
201 NLILLVKHWYHQVCLQGLWKETLPPVYALELLTIFAWEQGCKKDAFSLAE 250
251 GLRTVLGLIQQHQHLCVFWTVNYGFEDPAVGQFLQRQLKRPRPVILDPAD 300
301 PTWDLGNGAAWHWDLLAQEAASCYDHPCFLRGMGDPVQSWKGPGLPRAGC 350
351 SGLGHPIQLDPNQKTPENSKSLNAVYPRAGSKPPSCPAPGPTGAASIVPS 400
401 VPGMALDLSQIPTKELDRFIQDHLKPSPQFQEQVKKAIDIILRCLHENCV 450
451 HKASRVSKGGSFGRGTDLRDGCDVELIIFLNCFTDYKDQGPRRAEILDEM 500
501 RAQLESWWQDQVPSLSLQFPEQNVPEALQFQLVSTALKSWTDVSLLPAFD 550
551 AVGQLSSGTKPNPQVYSRLLTSGCQEGEHKACFAELRRNFMNIRPVKLKN 600
601 LILLVKHWYRQVAAQNKGKGPAPASLPPAYALELLTIFAWEQGCRQDCFN 650
651 MAQGFRTVLGLVQQHQQLCVYWTVNYSTEDPAMRMHLLGQLRKPRPLVLD 700
701 PADPTWNVGHGSWELLAQEAAALGMQACFLSRDGTSVQPWDVMPALLYQT 750
751 PAGDLDKFISEFLQPNRQFLAQVNKAVDTICSFLKENCFRNSPIKVIKVV 800
801 KGGSSAKGTALRGRSDADLVVFLSCFSQFTEQGNKRAEIISEIRAQLEAC 850
851 QQERQFEVKFEVSKWENPRVLSFSLTSQTMLDQSVDFDVLPAFDALGQLV 900
901 SGSRPSSQVYVDLIHSYSNAGEYSTCFTELQRDFIISRPTKLKSLIRLVK 950
951 HWYQQCTKISKGRGSLPPQHGLELLTVYAWEQGGKDSQFNMAEGFRTVLE 1000
1001 LVTQYRQLCIYWTINYNAKDKTVGDFLKQQLQKPRPIILDPADPTGNLGH 1050
1051 NARWDLLAKEAAACTSALCCMGRNGIPIQPWPVKAAV 1087
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.