advertisement: compare things at compare-stuff.com! |
Within the mainly- class there are architectural differences in pattern
composition which help explain the prediction results given in
Section 3.4.2. Highly significant
scores are seen
for Cys-containing duplets between ribbon and non-ribbon architectures
(Table 3.7). Disulphide bonds are important in ribbon
architectures; the cysteine knot topology (CATH code 2.10.90) has a very
well conserved pattern of Cys residues (see also Chapter 4). The
overabundance of Cys in the ribbon architecture is therefore easily
explained.
Observed - Expected (![]() |
|||||
pattern | ![]() |
Other | Ribbon | ||
C | . . | C | 300.0 | -13.3 | 13.3 |
Y | . . | C | 68.5 | -3.7 | 3.7 |
C | . . | G | 66.7 | -7.1 | 7.1 |
C | . . | K | 37.0 | -2.7 | 2.7 |
C | . . | F | 31.4 | -0.9 | 0.9 |
M | . . | C | 31.4 | -0.9 | 0.9 |
H | . . | C | 29.4 | -1.8 | 1.8 |
E | . . | C | 27.5 | -2.7 | 2.7 |
C | . . | T | 27.5 | -2.7 | 2.7 |
N | . . | C | 24.2 | -2.6 | 2.6 |
A | . . | C | 24.2 | -2.6 | 2.6 |
The analysis of duplet frequencies across the three main
non-ribbon architectures (sandwich, barrel and distorted sandwich) does not
give such a clear picture (in agreement with the poorer predictions in
Section 3.4.2). None of the duplets has significant
results at the level of
(Table 3.8 shows
the top 10 duplets ranked by
). Nevertheless, there appears to
be a trend towards Gly containing duplets (Gly-X-X-Tyr, Asp-X-X-Gly and to
a lesser extent Gly-X-X-Asp) in the barrel architecture. This suggests
that flexibility of Gly is employed to create the barrel architecture,
perhaps in
turns and hairpins. In Figure 3.4(c),
duplets with
are shown in red on the porin
structure[Cowan et al., 1992], domain 1pho00. This is a very large barrel,
although not the most typical, perhaps. No under-abundant duplets are
present in this structure (they would be shown in blue). In this figure,
the three Gly-containing duplets appear to be found in or near turns.
Quantitative
analysis of domains from these three architectures
shows that Gly-X-X-Tyr is found mainly in strand (
). Asp-X-X-Gly
is very significantly over-abundant in turns (
). The secondary
structural preference (for turn) of Gly-X-X-Asp is not significant.
Observed - Expected (![]() |
||||||
pattern | ![]() |
Sand. | Barrel | Dist. Sand. | ||
G | . . | Y | 21.2 | -8.8 | 8.9 | -0.1 |
D | . . | G | 18.5 | -11.4 | 10.0 | 1.4 |
G | . . | C | 14.6 | -2.3 | -1.4 | 3.7 |
A | . . | C | 14.5 | -3.0 | -0.0 | 3.1 |
C | . . | Q | 14.4 | -1.8 | -0.6 | 2.4 |
G | . . | D | 13.6 | -6.9 | 6.5 | 0.3 |
T | . . | K | 9.1 | -3.4 | -0.5 | 3.9 |
A | . . | Y | 8.8 | -2.6 | 5.3 | -2.7 |
D | . . | R | 7.9 | -2.7 | 2.7 | -0.0 |
P | . . | V | 7.4 | 6.5 | -4.2 | -2.3 |